The circle of violence: The story of Yanomamo Kinship and retaliation
- Rules or laws against killing are essentially a cultural universal, meaning all cultures have rules regarding the killing other people and the punishments for breaking these rules. How do the Yanomamo rules regarding killing and the consequences for breaking these rules differ from the rules in Western cultures in general? (5 pts) Answer: The Yanomamo, an indigenous group in the Amazon, have a distinct approach to killing compared to Western cultures. Violence is ingrained in their culture, with killing sometimes seen as a necessary means of resolving conflicts or avenging wrongs especially over women . Conflicts are common and often lead to killings and a cycle of revenge. Unlike Western societies with formal legal systems and punishments violating the law, the Yanomamo rely on social norms and the threat of retaliation to regulate behavior. There is no centralized authority like we have, and consequences for killing typically involve retaliation from the victim's family or community. In western culture today some would say or call it vigilante work. While Western cultures emphasize individual rights and state-controlled justice, condemning violence and prioritizing peaceful conflict resolution, the Yanomamo's emphasis on fierceness and revenge. According to studies, Approximately 44% of males aged 25 and older have killed someone, and violence accounts for roughly 30% of adult male deaths.
- Describe the process of revenge killings as it is expressed in Yanomamo populations. (5 pts) Answer: To describe the process of revenge killing among the Yanomamo, it's crucial to understand the reason for such frequent violence. This widespread violence contributes to a continuous loop of revenge. An offense, like Rape, Or infidelity or even accusations of infidelity as well as breaking the promise of giving away a bride can sparks a violent and deadly response. Without a formal legal system, the Yanomamo rely on retaliation to maintain order. On the eve of the raid, the warriors make what's called a "effigy" of the person they want dead, but like all battles , they often kill the first enemy they encounter. A raid is launched, often resulting in deaths and there starts the cycle of retaliation. The victim's family is obligated to retaliate, with deadly force. Men who kill achieve "unokai" status, gaining respect and hierarchy, which can further influence these actions. This cycle can continue for generations, creating a volatile environment where violence is a constant threat. While raids aren't always fatal, and women and children can be victims, the motivations behind these acts are complex, involving honor, fear, and maintaining social balance within their culture
- Revenge killings are a dangerous for those who take part. What are the benefits of obtaining the status of unokais? How do they compare to the benefits of being a non-unokais? Why would a man choose to become an unokais instead of being a non-unokais? (10 pts) Answer: Men who kill achieve "Unokai" status, gaining respect and hierarchy, which can further influence these actions. Becoming an Unokai among the Yanomamo is a dangerous but rewarding choice. Unokais gain respect and power, receiving better treatment and more influence. This higher status helps them find wives and provide for their families. Killing also has spiritual significance. Non-unokais are safer but less respected. Men become unokais because their culture values aggression, especially the woman. In a violent society, the need to protect family and the desire for status can make the risks seem worthwhile. Cycle of violence
Political Structure: Yanomamo villages lack central authority or a justice system and revenge killings is the result of decentralized system which is essentially their form of justice. The threat of violence elevates aggressive leaders and prevents larger political units from forming. The absence of higher authority fuels revenge cycles.
-
Social Status: Unokai status, gained through killing, elevates social standing. Its their right of passage, like a boy becoming a men. Revenge killings are tied to social growth and higher ranking in their community. The constant threat of violence emphasizes male warrior roles and aggression.
-
Kinship: Kinship is sacred, and revenge killings are driven by obligations to kin. The cycle of revenge disrupts families and creates feuds but it also shows honor and bravery to a kin who was murdered. Strong kinship ties are essential and are the reason for these types of retaliatory raids.
-
Marriage & Reproduction: Unokai status makes men more desirable partners, incentivizing violence. However, violence disrupts families and impacts reproduction. Competition for women, Jealousy false accusation are a main cause of conflict, and it really complicates the relationship between revenge killings, marriage, and reproduction.
- Behaviors that are usually labeled as “anti-social”, such as killing other people, are generally thought to be a bad thing to do under most circumstances, other than defense. Why do we need laws against something that no one should want to do? Use your reading of the article to help you explain your answer. Answers: Even though everyone knows killing is wrong, we still need laws against it. Laws help stop people from killing by threatening punishment. They also make it clear what counts as illegal killing, even in tricky situations. Laws give a way to get justice and prevent people from taking revenge themselves. Plus, they show that society thinks human life is important. The Yanomamo, who don't have these kinds of laws, show what can happen when there aren't clear rules and ways to get justice, things get violent. Laws aren't just for the few people who might kill, they're for everyone's safety.
1. "Violence is ingrained in their culture"
ReplyDeleteCareful... violent action is "ingrained" in all cultures... which is why all cultures have laws about committing violence.
"Yanomamo rely on social norms and the threat of retaliation to regulate behavior."
Aren't these effectively laws? Laws don't need to be written down to be "laws". They just need to be agreed upon rules of behavior, enforced with established consequences.
"the Yanomamo's emphasis on fierceness and revenge"
Yes, but this is how the Yanomamo respond to murder, with a set of consequences that are designed to discourage bad behavior. While this appears on the surface to be drastically different from our system, we also have a set of consequences designed to discourage bad behavior. They underlying function is the same even if they approach is different.
2. "An offense, like Rape, Or infidelity or even accusations of infidelity as well as breaking the promise of giving away a bride can sparks a violent and deadly response."
Let's rephrase this without the ethnocentrism: So when a crime is committed, it sparks consequences for breaking the rules of this community.
"Without a formal legal system, the Yanomamo rely on retaliation to maintain order."
The Yanomamo have a system of justice. It just doesn't look like ours.
Beyond that, good description of this practice. Do women have a role in these traditional behaviors? Do they take part at all?
3. "Non-unokais are safer but less respected."
Well, they are less likely to die or be injured in a revenge killing (because they aren't there) but they are also more likely to be a *victim* of a raid for women or murder. Otherwise, good description here.
4.
Political structure: "Yanomamo villages lack central authority or a justice system
That's false. Each village has a leader who serves as a "central authority" and they do have a system of justice. That is what the Unokais system is.
Otherwise, good connection drawn between the Unokais system and political power.
Social status/organization: Good, but can women gain social status through this system?
Kinship: You explain how kinship influences the unokais system, but what about the other way around? How does the unokais system impact a person's kinship system? This system of killings works to give high status unokais a larger system of kin, through marriage, tying the population together. From the other perspective, kinship determines who are expected to kill and who they can kill.
Marriage and reproduction: Can we be more explicit here? The more successful a man is as a Unokais the more likely he will be able to marry (perhaps even multiple times) and the more children he is likely to have. There is a direct connect between Unokais success and reproductive success.
Google limited the length of my comment so I will finish it here:
Delete______________________________________________________________
5. "Even though everyone knows killing is wrong, we still need laws against it. "
Yes, but WHY? You aren't actually answering the key question here: If killing is recognized to be socially/morally bad, why do we need laws against it? Shouldn't people just not kill? The point here is to recognize that there is killing in all cultures, including both the Yanomamo and Western societies. Both cultures have systems of dealing with it. But the question remains... why do people kill if this behavior is so universally recognized as "bad"?
Both Western cultures and the Yanomamo have laws against these behaviors, not because they are bad but because people may gain some benefit from engaging in those laws to the detriment of those around them.
We are creatures of biology, regardless of how "civilized" we might want to think we are. Killing can benefit an organism if they gain resources or a mate or defend their offspring in the process, correct? So that benefit is still there in humans, whether we like it or not. Killing is an instinctive, biological reaction to a threat of some sort, to our lives, to our family (genes) or to our resources, but it can also be a strategy to advance your survival, such as (for example) killing off a rival. Understand that this isn't excusing the behavior. It just explains it. But we need laws against this behavior, not because no one wants to do it but because sometimes people can benefit from this behavior... i.e., they DO want to kill because it benefits them. Laws protect us from selfish actions of others, acting to their own benefit and the harm of others.